Obama’s Second Misstep
Robert Sawtelle
The New York Times said, “The blogsphere has gone crazy since President-elect Obama announced Tuesday night that he intended to fulfill a campaign promise to his daughters, who, he said had “earned” a puppy.”
My dog, Miss Daisy a Bichon Friese, jumped up from a belly rub, rolled her eyes upward and shook her head. She was very upset with that information and couldn’t believe our new president would be so inconsiderate. After all, he said it would be probably be a hypoallergenic mutt from the shelter without any regard to nationality because Malia had allergies. (Obama’s First Misstep)
Now Obama said that it would be ‘a puppy’ not two puppies but ‘a puppy’. In other words, the girls would only have one half puppy each. Is that fair”? Where would the dog sleep…whose room…whose bed? Who would get to name him/her (another issue)? Would there be a vote and who would break the tie…Vice President Joe Biden?
Little girls do sometimes fight over silly things and this would be the perfect issue to cause disharmony…something Sara Palin would likely promote as poor family values.
Miss Daisy is right and lobbies for two puppies plus the fact that one more dog would not have to be put to sleep. (Why not a couple more)?






